Live Music Archive
Librivox Free Audio
Metropolitan Museum
Cleveland Museum of Art
Internet Arcade
Console Living Room
Books to Borrow
Open Library
TV News
Understanding 9/11
This rare Sherlock Holmes film was released at the same time as the Raymond Massey picture "The Speckled Band". The story is partly based on two Conan Doyle short stories: "The Final Problem" and "The Empty House".
Sceptical about the potential success of the film, the producers sold the rights to the film to "First Division Pictures" for 800 pounds. The film was released in July 1931 under the title "Sherlock Holmes' Fatal Hour". It was very successful, running for over a month on Broadway, which was unprecidented for a British produced programmer.
Reviews hailed the film for "bringing the real Sherlock Holmes to the screen." This prompted 4 more movies in the series The Missing Rembrandt (still considered lost), The Sign of Four, The Triumph of Sherlock Holmes and The Silver Blaze/Murder at the Baskervilles.
This film was deemed lost when the only known print (a 16 mm reduction print of the US version) went missing after being shown at a Sherlock Holmes Society reception for Arthur Wontner in 1955. This version comes from a second generation copy with the titles replaced due to focus/framing issues.
PLEASE NOTE: The film is public domain. The above descriptive text is not. Please ask permission before reusing this text in any way.
Sceptical about the potential success of the film, the producers sold the rights to the film to "First Division Pictures" for 800 pounds. The film was released in July 1931 under the title "Sherlock Holmes' Fatal Hour". It was very successful, running for over a month on Broadway, which was unprecidented for a British produced programmer.
Reviews hailed the film for "bringing the real Sherlock Holmes to the screen." This prompted 4 more movies in the series The Missing Rembrandt (still considered lost), The Sign of Four, The Triumph of Sherlock Holmes and The Silver Blaze/Murder at the Baskervilles.
This film was deemed lost when the only known print (a 16 mm reduction print of the US version) went missing after being shown at a Sherlock Holmes Society reception for Arthur Wontner in 1955. This version comes from a second generation copy with the titles replaced due to focus/framing issues.
PLEASE NOTE: The film is public domain. The above descriptive text is not. Please ask permission before reusing this text in any way.
Reviews
Reviewer:
johnmmc
-
favoritefavoritefavoritefavoritefavorite -
August 11, 2010
Subject: Milestone talkie
Subject: Milestone talkie
Whether one likes it or not, this film and Arthur Wontner have important places in Holmesian film history.
In "Sherlock Holmes: A Centenary Celebration" (Justin Knowles Publishing Group: 1986"), author Allen Eyles wrote, " ... there was Arthur Wontner whose characterization of Holmes was simply masterly. Wontner was in his mid-fities when he first played Holmes in the 1931 release, 'The Sleeping Cardinal.' He had the voice, looks and presence to be totally convincing as Holmes, although it was necessarily an ageing Holmes, one more sedate and less physically active but with exactly the right pensive manner.
"The tall, thin Wontner is closer to the illustrations [by Sidney Paget] of Holmes in 'The Strand Magazine' than any other actor has been. ... 'The Sleeping Cardinal' was well received, and Arthur Wontner's performance gained the accolades it deserved."
Wontner played Holmes in following films and made his last performance on radio in 1943 in a BBC adaptation of "The Boxcombe Valley Mystery." Eyles wrote that "Wontner's fine interpretation was recognized by the new Sherlock Holmes Society of London, when he was the guest of honour at the annual dinner in 1955," one of only two actors who'd played Holmes to be so honored.
My sincerest thanks to IA and whomever provided this and other historical S.H. films available on the Net.
In "Sherlock Holmes: A Centenary Celebration" (Justin Knowles Publishing Group: 1986"), author Allen Eyles wrote, " ... there was Arthur Wontner whose characterization of Holmes was simply masterly. Wontner was in his mid-fities when he first played Holmes in the 1931 release, 'The Sleeping Cardinal.' He had the voice, looks and presence to be totally convincing as Holmes, although it was necessarily an ageing Holmes, one more sedate and less physically active but with exactly the right pensive manner.
"The tall, thin Wontner is closer to the illustrations [by Sidney Paget] of Holmes in 'The Strand Magazine' than any other actor has been. ... 'The Sleeping Cardinal' was well received, and Arthur Wontner's performance gained the accolades it deserved."
Wontner played Holmes in following films and made his last performance on radio in 1943 in a BBC adaptation of "The Boxcombe Valley Mystery." Eyles wrote that "Wontner's fine interpretation was recognized by the new Sherlock Holmes Society of London, when he was the guest of honour at the annual dinner in 1955," one of only two actors who'd played Holmes to be so honored.
My sincerest thanks to IA and whomever provided this and other historical S.H. films available on the Net.
Reviewer:
Captain Kronos
-
favoritefavoritefavoritefavorite -
April 20, 2010
Subject: Not Sleep-Inducing
Subject: Not Sleep-Inducing
A few giggles, relatively short and to the point, this isn't an action-packed Holmes but a nice little film regardless. Quite 'armless. Visually quite interesting, exploiting the visual impact of light and dark with the admittedly limited camera technology used. The sound of footsteps on stairs hasn't been this creepy since Frankenstein.
An unusually bright Watson, a non-catty Lestrade and a random woman perpetually wearing evening gowns complete the notable secondaries, and I somehow in my sleep-deprived mind suspect that the latter was added to counteract a very touchy-feely Holmes. Well worth a watch, although the blurriness was a tad annoying. Oh well-- sic transit gloria cinema and all that.
But ROBERT Moriarty? If you say so Holmes...
An unusually bright Watson, a non-catty Lestrade and a random woman perpetually wearing evening gowns complete the notable secondaries, and I somehow in my sleep-deprived mind suspect that the latter was added to counteract a very touchy-feely Holmes. Well worth a watch, although the blurriness was a tad annoying. Oh well-- sic transit gloria cinema and all that.
But ROBERT Moriarty? If you say so Holmes...
Reviewer:
Laraine_Lynn
-
-
September 7, 2009
Subject: similar comment
Subject: similar comment
I use the search function to find movies, but not all movies have the appropriate keywords/metadata, and so on. It is sometimes hard to find things.
Reviewer:
realthog
-
-
July 13, 2009
Subject: wrong categorization
Subject: wrong categorization
How on earth can this be considered an Open Source movie when it quite clearly is not?
I assume it's in the Public Domain. If so, it belongs in the Feature Films section, here: http://www.archive.org/details/feature_films.
Quite a few Public Domain features seem recently to have been erroneously uploaded into the Open Source section, where of course they immediately get lost among all the millions of experimental animations and holiday snaps. It's destroying the Archive.
I assume it's in the Public Domain. If so, it belongs in the Feature Films section, here: http://www.archive.org/details/feature_films.
Quite a few Public Domain features seem recently to have been erroneously uploaded into the Open Source section, where of course they immediately get lost among all the millions of experimental animations and holiday snaps. It's destroying the Archive.
26,700 Views
39 Favorites
IN COLLECTIONS
The Video Cellar Collection
Feature Films 
Movies 
Uploaded by Video-Cellar on
